Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wisla sharks
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Singularity 05:42, 24 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Wisla sharks[edit]
Strongly delete - I can't even guess about what this article is . It looks like a Wisła Kraków squad , but there is also some players names who don't play there....Bartekos (talk) 18:25, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- This AfD was incomplete. It is listed now. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 02:53, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete (A1) Based on the position abbreviations, I have to assume this is a soccer team, however no information is given at all other than the roster. As the page has been abandoned by it's creator for almost two weeks, I don't see any hope in this getting resolved. Google gets zilch, other than the fact that they do exist and are from Poland. Hersfold (t/a/c) 05:34, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. -- Magioladitis (talk) 09:55, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of football (soccer) related deletions. ChrisTheDude (talk) 11:28, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. The Wisła Sharks are a football hooligan "firm" from Krakόw. I presume the names in the article who are not players are members of this group. Phil Bridger (talk) 11:43, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per Phil Bridger. пﮟოьεԻ 57 14:36, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete. The only "Wisla Sharks" appear to be football hooligans.--Michig (talk) 21:28, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - non-notable. GiantSnowman (talk) 19:13, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poland-related deletions. —Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 21:17, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Save as a teenagar's dream team in all-Polish playoffs in soccer. Much better performance than the many phony articles about false Solidarność' martyrs created lately in Polish Wikipedia just like this one. greg park avenue (talk) 00:09, 21 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- a teenagar's dream team in all-Polish playoffs in soccer - huh??!?!? ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:50, 21 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Just a harmless joke made by a school boy from Poland. What I am really concerned about is a series of phony articles in Polish Wikipedia produced recently by one-purpose sockpuppets about the Solidarity movement during martial law without any substantial references, and I suspect that the current Polish president awards the medals supporting his choice on the misleading information inserted in Polish Wikipedia only (it'd be a major abuse of Wikipedia), see this one regarding Tadeusz Świerczewski, and there are many more, such articles. What I have just discovered by a coincidence seems to be to me just like scratching the top of an iceberg. Here's not a place to supply the correct links, but if you or someone were interested, contact me on my talk page. greg park avenue (talk) 17:52, 21 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The English Wikipedia is not the place to talk about stuff on the Polish Wikipedia. – PeeJay 22:07, 21 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- I don't see why not? It's Poland's related section and 10% of Wikipedia articles are written in Polish, many of which are translated in to English, and many of these are pure hoax - a major source of disinformation flow cleverly created by sophistically trained specialists from former SB (Polish equivalent of KGB). It's about time someone starts to talk about it. greg park avenue (talk) 13:07, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- You don't see why not? I'll tell you why. It's because it's not our responsibility to deal with the Polish Wikipedia. Take it up with the admins there, or deal with it yourself. – PeeJay 13:51, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Do it myself? I am much to old to keep fort alone against all army. Even much younger than me, my favorite Polish editor User:Halibutt, walked away like a movie star. Smile. greg park avenue (talk) 16:01, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- You don't see why not? I'll tell you why. It's because it's not our responsibility to deal with the Polish Wikipedia. Take it up with the admins there, or deal with it yourself. – PeeJay 13:51, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- I don't see why not? It's Poland's related section and 10% of Wikipedia articles are written in Polish, many of which are translated in to English, and many of these are pure hoax - a major source of disinformation flow cleverly created by sophistically trained specialists from former SB (Polish equivalent of KGB). It's about time someone starts to talk about it. greg park avenue (talk) 13:07, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The English Wikipedia is not the place to talk about stuff on the Polish Wikipedia. – PeeJay 22:07, 21 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Just a harmless joke made by a school boy from Poland. What I am really concerned about is a series of phony articles in Polish Wikipedia produced recently by one-purpose sockpuppets about the Solidarity movement during martial law without any substantial references, and I suspect that the current Polish president awards the medals supporting his choice on the misleading information inserted in Polish Wikipedia only (it'd be a major abuse of Wikipedia), see this one regarding Tadeusz Świerczewski, and there are many more, such articles. What I have just discovered by a coincidence seems to be to me just like scratching the top of an iceberg. Here's not a place to supply the correct links, but if you or someone were interested, contact me on my talk page. greg park avenue (talk) 17:52, 21 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.